How likely is an oil spill if the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline goes ahead?

« BACK TO FAQ

 

This page builds on information from a Tsleil-Waututh Nation report that assesses the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline and tanker project. You can read and download the full report here.

 

Based on the Kinder Morgan’s past record, an oil spill is likely to happen at least once in four years, and the proposed pipeline will make oil spills more likely.

  • If the proposed pipeline is implemented, the likelihood of a spill in the Burrard Inlet over fifty years lies at 79-87% for any size spill (Trans Mountain Assessment Report, p. 66)
    • Smaller spills (1,000 barrels) are very likely
    • There is a 37% chance of a larger spill (10,000 barrels) over fifty years
    • There is a 29% likelihood of a worst-case spill (100,000 barrels) over fifty years
  • The proposed pipeline will increase tanker traffic seven times over, and increase the risk of spills in the vulnerable Burrard Inlet even further (Trans Mountain Assessment Report, p. 6)

 

 

Tar sands tanker route in the Salish Sea. Source: Wilderness Committee.

Tar sands tanker route in the Salish Sea.

 

  • The figures on tanker and terminal oil provided by Kinder Morgan, in its own risk assessment, are unreliable and inconsistent with scientific research (Trans Mountain Assessment Report, p. 69).

 

  • Dr. Jerry Galt from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration states that Kinder Morgan’s own risk assessment “underestimated the extent and duration of spills in the Burrard Inlet because it did not [consider] stranded oil to refloat” (Assessment Report, p. 69).

 

Due to their weight and size, tankers must be escorted by tugboat at a certain time of day.

 

  • The likelihood of a spill is worsened by the fact that tankers must pass through the Second Narrows Movement Restricted Area of the Burrard Inlet. This means that, due to their weight and size, tankers will remain in the Inlet longer because they will have to wait until daylight high tide before being escorted back by a tug (CredBC).
  • “There are no fail-safe methods to transport oil or diluted bitumen over water” (CredBC).
  • “While the technology of tankers has improved, there are still people at the heart of tanker operation and human error is inevitable” (CredBC).

The Tsleil-Waututh Nation cannot accept the increased risks, effects, and consequences of even another small incident (Trans Mountain Assessment Report, p. 3)

Real climate leadership means stopping the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline. Click here to find out how.


What Else Can I Do to Help?

Spread the Word

When people see other people they know or can relate to expressing their views, it can make a big difference.

Spread the word!

« BACK TO FAQ

You might also be interested in

Blog Get all the latest news and updates on the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline from the Tsleil-Waututh Sacred Trust Initiative here.
Why did the NEB approve the Kinder Morgan pipeline if its economic impact is negative? Acoustic disturbance: Increased tanker traffic will cause acoustic disruption underwater, and cause marine animals to change their behaviour -- especially culturally important species such as whales and blackfish. For more information, see our page on the pipeline's impacts on whales.
Will landowners along the pipeline route be affected? The Trans Mountain Pipeline project has the potential to affect thousands of landowners along the proposed route. The proposed route would run from the tar sands in northern Alberta through Jasper National Park. From there it would enter the Lower Mainland of British Columbia ...

Got a question?