Did you know? In case of an oil spill, Kinder Morgan has to provide you with bottled water.

Would the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline risk British Columbia drinking water?



This page summarizes information from a Tsleil-Waututh Nation report that assesses the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline and tanker project. You can read and download the full report here.


Yes, the proposed pipeline would endanger some of our local sources of drinking water, and threaten Burrard Inlet and the Fraser River in various locations. In some communities, the pipeline would threaten the only water source they have available.


Drinking Water


The Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer

  • The Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer is the source from which drinking water is extracted for Abbotsford:
    • The existing and proposed pipelines would transport diluted bitumen directly over the aquifer. This aquifer is particularly susceptible to being polluted, as oil that is spilled elsewhere may contaminate the water source by mixing with rainfall (City of Abbotsford).
    • Citizens and businesses depend on adequate, uncontaminated groundwater supplied by this aquifer, and a spill that contaminates the aquifer would mean an immediate threat to public health.


The Coldwater Valley watershed and Coldwater aquifer

  • The proposed pipeline runs through the recharge zone that feeds the Coldwater aquifer, located near Merritt, BC.
  • The Coldwater Indian Band relies on the Coldwater Valley watershed and Coldwater aquifer for drinking water and irrigation (From the Merritt Herald).
  • According to Chief Lee Spahan, the aquifer could never be remediated to potable standards once contaminated by a pipeline spill or release, meaning the Band would never be able to access their drinking water again (From TWN).



British Columbia’s environmental assessment certificate

  • On January 11, 2017, the government of British Columbia issued the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline an Environmental Assessment Certificate. (Government of BC)
  • The certificate contains 37 conditions, which will supplement the conditions imposed by the National Energy Board (NEB) referenced on page 8 of its project report. (Government of Canada)
  • The 37 conditions include measures that Kinder Morgan has to take when an oil spill happens. (It is estimated that there is a  79-87% chance of an oil spill over the next fifty years).


Condition 26

  • Condition 26 of the BC Provincial Government’s Environmental Assessment Certificate requires that Kinder Morgan provide citizens with bottled water should drinking water become contaminated:
    • “In the event that a spill originating from the Project is confirmed to have contaminated drinking water  [Kinder Morgan] must provide one or more alternate source(s) of drinking water for all persons who use water for human or animal consumption from the contaminated water source for the period of time during which contamination exists” (Table of Conditions for an Environmental Assessment Certificate, Condition 26).
  • With this condition, the provincial government clearly acknowledges the very real threat that the proposed pipeline poses to water in British Columbia, yet it approved the pipeline project regardless.


To require Kinder Morgan to provide bottled water while water sources remain contaminated is neither a realistic nor sustainable solution to the problem.

We have the chance to defend our children’s health and future by stopping the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline. Click here to learn more.


What Else Can I Do to Help?

Spread the Word

When people see other people they know or can relate to expressing their views, it can make a big difference.

Spread the word!


You might also be interested in

What You Can Do Find out what you can do to stop the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline. Sign up to become a friend of the Sacred Trust, donate, or write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper.
Is there a market for the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline’s products? There is no market for the products proposed to be shipped on it. We do not need to expand current pipeline infrastructure to meet the demand for Canadian diluted bitumen (dilbit). Neither the NEB nor Kinder Morgan tested market facts to determine whether markets exist, or whether there is potential to develop them.
What would the economic cost of an oil spill be? A 2012 study on the potential economic impact of a tanker spill on ocean-based industries in British Columbia, conducted by the Fisheries Centre of the University of British Columbia estimates that a medium-sized spill on British Columbia's north coast would cost the regional economy up to $189 million.

Become a friend of the Sacred Trust

Stay informed about the Kinder Morgan proposal and don’t miss important updates from the Sacred Trust team.
  • .

Got a question?