Economists say there is no market for the dilbit Kinder Morgan wants to ship on the proposed pipeline.

Is there a market for the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline’s products?

« BACK TO FAQ

 

This page builds on information from a Tsleil-Waututh Nation report that assesses the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline and tanker project. You can read and download the full report here.

 

There is no market for the diluted bitumen products proposed to be shipped on the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline. We do not need to expand current pipeline infrastructure to meet the demand for Canadian diluted bitumen (dilbit).

 

  • Neither the NEB nor Kinder Morgan tested market facts to determine whether markets exist, or whether there is potential to develop them (Allan, 2016, p. 14).
  • Past attempts by Canadian producers and off-shore refiners to establish an (offshore) market for the products proposed to be shipped on the pipeline have failed (Allan, 2016, p. 20)
    • Expanding into new markets costs a lot of time and money, and require competitive pricing strategies and business relationships to push trade forward (Allan, 2016, p. 3).

 Source: Allan, 2016, p. 15

  • There is no offshore market for the dilbit that Kinder Morgan intends to ship on the proposed pipeline: Even in recent years, very little dilbit has been shipped to the US, and only one has been shipped to non-US destinations as of 2016 (Allan, 2016, p. 3).

 

  • Demand for waterborne transport (measured by the number of tankers arriving in Vancouver port) has been declining since firm access to the Westridge Marine Terminal was granted. Although Kinder Morgan estimated that an average of 60 tankers a year would be loaded in Vancouver, this has not been the case since 2010 (Allan, 2016, pp. 15-16).

 

Source: Allan, 2016, p. 16

 

  • Since 2012 there have been, at most, 5 tankers per year, carrying diluted bitumen intended for Asian markets (Allan, 2016, p. 17). Current research states that there are few Asian markets, and they are very difficult to access (Allan, 2016, p. 19).
  • Developing an offshore market would take years or might even be entirely impossible (Allan, 2016, p. 3).

We have the chance to focus on a sustainable economy by the stopping the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline. Click here to learn more.

 

What Else Can I Do to Help?

Spread the Word

When people see other people they know or can relate to expressing their views, it can make a big difference.

Spread the word!

« BACK TO FAQ

You might also be interested in

What would the impact of an oil spill in Burrard Inlet be? Every inch of Burrard Inlet, including the Indian Arm, would likely be affected by an oil spill. Such an incident would also affect Tsleil-Waututh cultural activities. Within 48 hours, 90% of the oil would strand on our beaches and foul up to 25 kilometres of shoreline ...
What is the net economic impact of the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline? The proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline would have a negative economic impact. In fact, the proposed pipeline is a net economic risk and cost to the Canadian economy, which would fall on the shoulders of the Canadian public. The net economic impact of the proposed pipeline becomes negative when ...
Does British Columbia rely on the jobs created through the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline? British Columbia does not rely on the jobs created through the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline. Kinder Morgan promises that the pipeline would create 50 permanent jobs in British Columbia, and 40 in Alberta. Kinder Morgan has been unclear about how many temporary jobs would be created for construction.

Become a friend of the Sacred Trust

Stay informed about the Kinder Morgan proposal and don’t miss important updates from the Sacred Trust team.
  • .

Got a question?