Does British Columbia rely on the jobs created through the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline?



British Columbia does not rely on the jobs created through the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline.


Permanent jobs created

  • Kinder Morgan promises that the pipeline would create 50 permanent jobs in British Columbia, and 40 in Alberta.


Temporary jobs created

  • Kinder Morgan has been unclear about how many temporary jobs would be created for construction, which would take place between 2017 and 2019.
  • According to CRED, Kinder Morgan has not stated whether they would employ British Columbians, other Canadians, or temporary foreign workers.


Jobs lost

  • Unifor and the Alberta Federation of Labour estimate that the lost jobs, the lost economic wealth, and the crowding out of existing jobs in other sectors (e.g. commercial fishing) that would arise from building the proposed pipeline, outweigh its economic benefits (Allan, 2016, p. 31)
  • According to CRED, the jobs of about 200,000 people in the Lower Mainland (in industries like real estate, tourism, hospitality, high tech, and film) rely on the health of the natural environment and Vancouver’s “greenest city” brand. An oil spill caused by pipeline or resulting tanker traffic, which is highly likely to happen, would put the jobs of about 200,000 people at risk.


You might also like

How will landowners along the pipeline route be affected? « BACK TO FAQ The Trans Mountain Pipeline project has the potential to affect thousands of landowners along the proposed route. The proposed route would run from the tar sands in northern Alberta through Jasper National Park. From there it would enter the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, where it would cross the Vedder Fan aquifer and Chilliwack's Protecte‎d Groundwater Zone. Next, it would run through Surrey, across the Fraser River to the Westridge Marine Terminal at Burrard Inlet i...
Is there a market for the products to be shipped on the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline? « BACK TO FAQ There is no market for the products proposed to be shipped on it. We do not need to expand current pipeline infrastructure to meet the demand for Canadian diluted bitumen (dilbit). Neither the NEB nor Kinder Morgan tested market facts to determine whether markets exist, or whether there is potential to develop them (Allan, 2016, p. 14). Past attempts by Canadian producers and off-shore refiners to establish an (offshore) market for the products proposed to be shipped...
If the overall economic impact of the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline is negative, how com... « BACK TO FAQ Contrary to the National Energy Board (NEB) report released in May 2016, there is no economic need and for the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline, and economic benefits do not outweigh economic risks. Experts like economist Robyn Allan show that the NEB’s conclusions are faulty, as research was based on a flawed methodology and outdated information (Allan, 2016, pp. 1-2). The NEB did not consider the economic interests of all Canadians and refused to assess “the environmental...
What You Can Do Want to help the Tsleil Waututh people stop the Kinder Morgan pipeline? Donate to our Legal Defence Fund: The Tsleil-Waututh nation is taking Kinder Morgan to the courts, and we need your help. We do not consent to the Kinder Morgan pipeline. We have set up a donation page for our legal fees with RAVEN (Respecting Aboriginal Values and Environmental Needs). Please help the Tsleil-Waututh people stop Kinder Morgan and donate to our legal defence fund here. Contact Your MLA The best w...

Get Action Alerts